Composing landscape level forest plans for forest areas under multiple private ownership

This study illustrates planning approaches available for forest planning concerning multiple private ownership, referred to here as regional planning. These approaches are necessary because of ecological reasons: evaluating the habitat quality of several species requires examining the forest landscape within areas larger than a single forest holding. Forest holdings are administratively delineated and do not coincide with habitat patches, which leads to interdependencies between forest holdings. The basic planning approaches applied in this study were the top-down, bottom-up and integrated approaches. In the top-down approach, the landscape-level plan was prepared according to landscape-level objectives, ignoring the holding-level objectives. In the bottom-up approach, the landscape-level plan was created by selecting the best combination among already accepted forest plan alternatives first created for each holding. In the integrated approach, landscape-level and forest-holding-level objectives were considered simultaneously in the same optimization model. It was concluded that a general ranking of the approaches is impossible because different planning situations emphasize different requirements. The ranking of approaches depends on the comparison criteria and the planning situation. It is also possible to use several approaches in one planning situation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60910/xg21-vpc4
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Composing landscape level forest plans for forest areas under multiple private ownership

Jyrki Kangas, Timo Pukkala, Mikko Kurttila
15 citations
Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive
Forest Management and Policy
article

Composing landscape level forest plans for forest areas under multiple private ownership

Jyrki Kangas, Timo Pukkala, Mikko Kurttila
article en
15 citations

Abstract

This study illustrates planning approaches available for forest planning concerning multiple private ownership, referred to here as regional planning. These approaches are necessary because of ecological reasons: evaluating the habitat quality of several species requires examining the forest landscape within areas larger than a single forest holding. Forest holdings are administratively delineated and do not coincide with habitat patches, which leads to interdependencies between forest holdings. The basic planning approaches applied in this study were the top-down, bottom-up and integrated approaches. In the top-down approach, the landscape-level plan was prepared according to landscape-level objectives, ignoring the holding-level objectives. In the bottom-up approach, the landscape-level plan was created by selecting the best combination among already accepted forest plan alternatives first created for each holding. In the integrated approach, landscape-level and forest-holding-level objectives were considered simultaneously in the same optimization model. It was concluded that a general ranking of the approaches is impossible because different planning situations emphasize different requirements. The ranking of approaches depends on the comparison criteria and the planning situation. It is also possible to use several approaches in one planning situation.

Boreal Environment Research Journal ArchiveVol. 6(4)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.