Efficacy of Olanzapine and Risperidone in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Design

This article compares the efficacy of olanzapine and risperidone for positive and negative symptoms using an 18-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover design. The hypotheses were that olanzapine would be more efficacious for treating negative symptoms, and that risperidone would be superior in treating positive symptoms. Positive and negative symptoms scores improved throughout treatment, regardless of medication type. Differences between the medications were found for negative and general psychopathology rating scales. Overall, olanzapine led to greater improvements in negative symptoms than did risperidone. When each scale was analyzed individually, greater improvements were found for olanzapine on Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) General,PANSS total, and Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS)attention. A nearly significant trend favoring olanzapine was found for the Calgary Depression Scale. Several negative symptom subscales followed a nonsignificant trend toward olanzapine being more efficacious than risperidone.Thus, there was a very consistent pattern of greater efficacy for olanzapine, particularly for negative symptoms. Despite the small number of subjects, this study shows the potential of a within-subject design to elucidate differences in efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychopharmacology Bulletin
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64719/pb.4157
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Treatment of Major Depression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Olanzapine and Risperidone in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Design

Michael P. Weisend, Ferràn Torres, Valerie Mead, Stephen P. Lewis et al.
7 citations
Psychopharmacology Bulletin
Treatment of Major Depression
article

Efficacy of Olanzapine and Risperidone in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Design

Michael P. Weisend, Ferràn Torres, Valerie Mead, Stephen P. Lewis, V.B. Tuason, Marianna LaNoue, Gregory A. Miller, Jessica Irwin, J. Christopher Edgar, José M. Cañive, Sandra N. Moses, Bartolomé Iglesias S., Valerie Mead, and Vicente B. Tuason
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This article compares the efficacy of olanzapine and risperidone for positive and negative symptoms using an 18-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover design. The hypotheses were that olanzapine would be more efficacious for treating negative symptoms, and that risperidone would be superior in treating positive symptoms. Positive and negative symptoms scores improved throughout treatment, regardless of medication type. Differences between the medications were found for negative and general psychopathology rating scales. Overall, olanzapine led to greater improvements in negative symptoms than did risperidone. When each scale was analyzed individually, greater improvements were found for olanzapine on Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) General,PANSS total, and Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS)attention. A nearly significant trend favoring olanzapine was found for the Calgary Depression Scale. Several negative symptom subscales followed a nonsignificant trend toward olanzapine being more efficacious than risperidone.Thus, there was a very consistent pattern of greater efficacy for olanzapine, particularly for negative symptoms. Despite the small number of subjects, this study shows the potential of a within-subject design to elucidate differences in efficacy.

Psychopharmacology BulletinVol. 39(1)
New Mexico VA Health Care System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Treatment of Major Depression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.