Styles of healthcare design and their impact on patients' well-being

The design of many hospitals is not in line with future end-user needs and requirements. A growing body of research shows evidence for the impact of the design of a physical environment on health and well-being. Patient safety cannot only be considered in terms of avoidance of physical harm but should also be considered with regard to improving their emotional well-being. While much effort is spent on improving the physical functionalities, the visual aspect of design and its impact on patients should also be considered. The design of waiting areas in particular communicate the initial impression of the overall healthcare setting as well as face the challenge of accommodating the needs of multiple types of end-users. The appearance of healthcare waiting areas often reflects the individual style of decision-makers, designers and architects instead of end-users themselves. In order to assess and compare different healthcare waiting areas, a formal classification of design styles and the way they are perceived by the end-user needs to be explored. While the term institutional is most consistently used to describe the clinical appearance, a broad number of classifications appear to have ambiguous meanings. No formal classifications of different healthcare design styles have been established and how they impact patients’ emotional response is not well-understood. This study seeks to explore the rationale behind participants’ classification process as a first step in order to understand how each style impacts upon end-user emotions.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003759959-122
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Styles of healthcare design and their impact on patients' well-being

Kieu Anh Vuong, Rebecca Cain, Paul Jennings, Elizabeth Burton
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Styles of healthcare design and their impact on patients' well-being

Kieu Anh Vuong, Rebecca Cain, Paul Jennings, Elizabeth Burton
article en

Abstract

The design of many hospitals is not in line with future end-user needs and requirements. A growing body of research shows evidence for the impact of the design of a physical environment on health and well-being. Patient safety cannot only be considered in terms of avoidance of physical harm but should also be considered with regard to improving their emotional well-being. While much effort is spent on improving the physical functionalities, the visual aspect of design and its impact on patients should also be considered. The design of waiting areas in particular communicate the initial impression of the overall healthcare setting as well as face the challenge of accommodating the needs of multiple types of end-users. The appearance of healthcare waiting areas often reflects the individual style of decision-makers, designers and architects instead of end-users themselves. In order to assess and compare different healthcare waiting areas, a formal classification of design styles and the way they are perceived by the end-user needs to be explored. While the term institutional is most consistently used to describe the clinical appearance, a broad number of classifications appear to have ambiguous meanings. No formal classifications of different healthcare design styles have been established and how they impact patients’ emotional response is not well-understood. This study seeks to explore the rationale behind participants’ classification process as a first step in order to understand how each style impacts upon end-user emotions.

Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.