Debonding in FRP strengthened beams: Stress assessment versus fracture mechanics approach

In the present paper we analyze the debonding failure of abeam strengthened by a fiber reinforced polymer. We propose an analytical approach, whose basic assumptions are that (i) sections inside the beam remain plane and (ii) the adhesive layer acts as a shear lag. A stress concentration is found at the edge of the reinforcement length. Two failure criteria are proposed to study the debonding process. The former is a stress assessment criterion, i.e. failure takes place whenever the maximum tangential stress reaches a limit value (the interfacial bond strength). The latter is an energy, fracture mechanics criterion, i.e. failure takes place as long as the strain energy release rate due to debonding reaches a critical value (the interfacial fracture energy). By means of Castigliano’s theorem, the load vs. deflection graph is drawn, showing the possible rising of both snap-back and snap-through instabilities.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003759751-56
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Debonding in FRP strengthened beams: Stress assessment versus fracture mechanics approach

Alberto Carpinteri, Nicola M. Pugno, Pietro Cornetti
5 citations
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Debonding in FRP strengthened beams: Stress assessment versus fracture mechanics approach

Alberto Carpinteri, Nicola M. Pugno, Pietro Cornetti
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In the present paper we analyze the debonding failure of abeam strengthened by a fiber reinforced polymer. We propose an analytical approach, whose basic assumptions are that (i) sections inside the beam remain plane and (ii) the adhesive layer acts as a shear lag. A stress concentration is found at the edge of the reinforcement length. Two failure criteria are proposed to study the debonding process. The former is a stress assessment criterion, i.e. failure takes place whenever the maximum tangential stress reaches a limit value (the interfacial bond strength). The latter is an energy, fracture mechanics criterion, i.e. failure takes place as long as the strain energy release rate due to debonding reaches a critical value (the interfacial fracture energy). By means of Castigliano’s theorem, the load vs. deflection graph is drawn, showing the possible rising of both snap-back and snap-through instabilities.

Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.