As Mandatory Binding Arbitration Meets the Class Action, Will the Class Action Survive?

Abstract This article considers the impact of arbitration on the future of class actions. In the author’s view, if litigants successfully meet the prerequisites for a class action, reviewing courts may: (1) order that the parties use arbitration to resolve the dispute, thus precluding claimants from using court or an arbitration venue for their class claims; (2) refuse to send the parties to arbitration, instead permitting claimants to litigate their class claims; (3) order that the dispute be resolved through a class arbitration process; or (4) order the dispute to arbitration but allow the arbitrators to determine whether the dispute should be resolved individually or on a class basis. The article concludes that when the parties agree to a broad arbitration clause, it is inappropriate to exclude an entire class of disputes from arbitration, unless permitting class arbitration would violate constitutional, statutory, or contractual interests. This article advocates that Congress enact legislation to prevent companies from using binding arbitration clauses to eliminate class actions entirely if society believes that companies should not be allowed to insulate themselves from class actions, and courts fail to accept the statutory and contractual arguments set out in this article or elsewhere.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197784518.003.0051
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

As Mandatory Binding Arbitration Meets the Class Action, Will the Class Action Survive?

Jean R. Sternlight
8 citations
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

As Mandatory Binding Arbitration Meets the Class Action, Will the Class Action Survive?

Jean R. Sternlight
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article considers the impact of arbitration on the future of class actions. In the author’s view, if litigants successfully meet the prerequisites for a class action, reviewing courts may: (1) order that the parties use arbitration to resolve the dispute, thus precluding claimants from using court or an arbitration venue for their class claims; (2) refuse to send the parties to arbitration, instead permitting claimants to litigate their class claims; (3) order that the dispute be resolved through a class arbitration process; or (4) order the dispute to arbitration but allow the arbitrators to determine whether the dispute should be resolved individually or on a class basis. The article concludes that when the parties agree to a broad arbitration clause, it is inappropriate to exclude an entire class of disputes from arbitration, unless permitting class arbitration would violate constitutional, statutory, or contractual interests. This article advocates that Congress enact legislation to prevent companies from using binding arbitration clauses to eliminate class actions entirely if society believes that companies should not be allowed to insulate themselves from class actions, and courts fail to accept the statutory and contractual arguments set out in this article or elsewhere.

Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.