Three dimensional analysis of building settlement caused by shaft construction

An analysis of a case history of settlement damage to a masonry building, due to the construction of a nearby shaft, is presented. Three-dimensional finite element analysis is used, in which the non-linear behaviour of both the soil (a heavily overconsolidated clay) and the building is taken into account. Procedures are used to capture the construction process as realistically as possible. Comparisons are made between a variety of analyses (including separate analyses of the building and the soil, and a fully coupled analysis of the whole system), as well as with observations at the site. The principal comparisons are in terms of observed surface settlements and of the categories of cracking damage suffered by the masonry building. It is concluded that the analysis technique can model adequately the interaction between the building and the ground, but that details of settlement and damage patterns depend critically on assumptions about the structure and stiffness of the building and its foundation.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003761952-c96
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three dimensional analysis of building settlement caused by shaft construction

Alan G. Bloodworth, G. T. Houlsby
7 citations
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Three dimensional analysis of building settlement caused by shaft construction

Alan G. Bloodworth, G. T. Houlsby
article en
7 citations

Abstract

An analysis of a case history of settlement damage to a masonry building, due to the construction of a nearby shaft, is presented. Three-dimensional finite element analysis is used, in which the non-linear behaviour of both the soil (a heavily overconsolidated clay) and the building is taken into account. Procedures are used to capture the construction process as realistically as possible. Comparisons are made between a variety of analyses (including separate analyses of the building and the soil, and a fully coupled analysis of the whole system), as well as with observations at the site. The principal comparisons are in terms of observed surface settlements and of the categories of cracking damage suffered by the masonry building. It is concluded that the analysis technique can model adequately the interaction between the building and the ground, but that details of settlement and damage patterns depend critically on assumptions about the structure and stiffness of the building and its foundation.

Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.